[Powderworks] Re: Ebay Seller Strikes Again
Bawolski@aol.com
Bawolski@aol.com
Sat, 17 Aug 2002 02:19:11 EDT
--part1_5f.2bc2120d.2a8f44df_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 8/16/2002 2:52:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
redzed84@yahoo.com writes:
> Fortunately, Powderworks has provided a better way -
> thanks to everyone involved in file sharing & the
> wonderful ftp server (thankyou thankyou thankyou)I'm
> referring here to the promos & rare singles, not the
> official releases that we've all bought...but then you
> knew that ;-)
>
Unfortunately, however, Powderworkers share this stuff
(some of which members themselves have recorded),
and this is where it ends up. Don't want to start a big
flame war here, but I guess when we justify this stuff
by saying it's ok because nobody pays for it, it still gets
into the wrong hands and thus provides the reasoning for
which I'm sure the band is against the recording of their shows.
I'm not pointing any fingers here, I have one or two bootleg
recordings (personally I just can't get into them because they
tend to sound so bad), but this debate comes up every so
often and I think this situation makes me think twice about it.
Mike
--part1_5f.2bc2120d.2a8f44df_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 8/16/2002 2:52:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time, redzed84@yahoo.com writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Fortunately, Powderworks has provided a better way -<BR>
thanks to everyone involved in file sharing & the<BR>
wonderful ftp server (thankyou thankyou thankyou)I'm<BR>
referring here to the promos & rare singles, not the<BR>
official releases that we've all bought...but then you<BR>
knew that ;-)<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
Unfortunately, however, Powderworkers share this stuff <BR>
(some of which members themselves have recorded),<BR>
and this is where it ends up. Don't want to start a big<BR>
flame war here, but I guess when we justify this stuff <BR>
by saying it's ok because nobody pays for it, it still gets<BR>
into the wrong hands and thus provides the reasoning for<BR>
which I'm sure the band is against the recording of their shows.<BR>
I'm not pointing any fingers here, I have one or two bootleg <BR>
recordings (personally I just can't get into them because they<BR>
tend to sound so bad), but this debate comes up every so <BR>
often and I think this situation makes me think twice about it.<BR>
<BR>
Mike<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></HTML>
--part1_5f.2bc2120d.2a8f44df_boundary--