[Powderworks] 10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1
Jane R
bunge91@hotmail.com
Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:37:41 +1000
I agree definatley 10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1 is the best. And taking it further
when the time comes to do one of those classic album programs 10 to 1 would
have to be the Oils featured album.
It would be really interesting to see Jim and Rob in a control room
discussing how it was put together.
Now we just have to wait for someone to do it!
Jane
>From: "Seth Cooper" <cooperseth@hotmail.com>
>To: powderworks@cs.colorado.edu
>Subject: Re: [Powderworks] 10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1
>Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 12:53:13 +0000
>
>
>Damien wrote:
>
>> Geeez i just listened to 10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1
>> (really loud) and i have to say i don't think there will
>> ever be a better album made anywhere, buy any band
>> full stop!.
>
>10..1 has been in my rotation recently, and playing it loud is mandatory.
>It was my first Oils album, got it at a garage sale in ~87 and it blew me
>away. After 16 years it still does, and the louder the sound the better
>the effect.
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get 10MB of e-mail storage! Sign up for Hotmail Extra Storage.
>http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es
>
>_______________________________________________
>Powderworks mailing list
>Powderworks@cs.colorado.edu
>http://www.cs.colorado.edu/mailman/listinfo/powderworks
_________________________________________________________________
Protect your inbox from harmful viruses with new ninemsn Premium. Click here
http://ninemsn.com.au/premium/landing.asp