Midnight Oil

[Powderworks] unsupportive article in the australian

Bawolski@aol.com Bawolski@aol.com
Thu, 12 Dec 2002 19:41:23 EST


--part1_74.27ac43e7.2b2a86b3_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 12/12/2002 2:59:43 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
par.lydmark@kustobsar.st writes:

> I don't remember if this already has been mentioned, but here is a VERY 
> unsupportive opinion about Peter going into politics by some airhead called 
> Tim Blair (published in The Australian, dec 5). In fact, it's very 
> unsupportive of the oils in general... Not nice reading at all.
> 
> <A HREF="http://theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,5616665%255E7583,00.html">
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> http://theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,5616665%255E7583,00.html</A>
> 
> 

Judging by the bitchy overtones in Blair's article somebody
must have peed in his Cheerios.

Mike

--part1_74.27ac43e7.2b2a86b3_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">In a message dated 12/12/2002 2:59:43 AM Pacific Standard Time, par.lydmark@kustobsar.st writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">I don't remember if this already has been mentioned, but here is a VERY unsupportive opinion about Peter going into politics by some airhead called Tim Blair (published in The Australian, dec 5). In fact, it's very unsupportive of the oils in general... Not nice reading at all.<BR>
<BR>
<A HREF="http://theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,5616665%255E7583,00.html">http://theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,5616665%255E7583,00.html</A><BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
Judging by the bitchy overtones in Blair's article somebody<BR>
must have peed in his Cheerios.<BR>
<BR>
Mike</FONT></HTML>

--part1_74.27ac43e7.2b2a86b3_boundary--