[Barry Callahan]

>But weren't we quick to blame him [Bin Laden] for Oklahoma City as well? No 
>doubt the man has been behind, or at the very least has smugly taken credit 
>for people acting on his beliefs and on his behalf...

The reason we were quick to assume that he was responsible in both cases is that 
he's been saying he was going to strike a new, huge blow against the United 
States for some time.  And the fact that there's already a US$5 Million price on 
his head (according to one news broadcast I saw lastnight) from things he's 
ALREADY claimed responsibility for.

But we didn't go off half-cocked at the Oklahoma City incident, and we won't do 
so now.  He's our primary suspect in this matter, but until investigators have 
enough evidence to suggest who IS responsible, be it him or somebody else 
entirely, or somebody publically claims credit, I don't expect us go go on the 
warpath.