Anybody seen anything real other than conjecture and comments on the tickets bundled with the Super Pack? My local show is a bit over a month away, and I'd feel a bit more comfortable if I had a couple tickets in hand or had people go through the process already. Not the most patient individual, I'm afraid, but for the Oils, I'll try.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Droid
On Apr 5, 2017 1:05 AM, "Chris email@example.com [powderworks]" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
A month today until the Overflow Tank!
I wonder if they'll ship on the 5th, or ship to hopefully land on my doorstep on the 5th? Not that it makes a big difference.....
I'm disappointed too.
Hopefully some healthy venting will help, because beyond that there's seemingly nothing that can be done to change what has happened. It doesn't feel completely fair and equitable, but it is what it is. The band owes me nothing and I don't feel a sense of entitlement. But I agree it sure would have been nice to have gone to the gig.
Let's instead look forward to the Overflow box set and the gigs that we already have tickets to. There'll all going to be fricking awesome!
> The band decided to allocate only 50 and only to NSW and to do it in secret
> there is no need for this to be an either/or
Therein is the crux of my frustration.
If the band was willing to offer 50 tickets to Powderworkers, why 50 to the Facebook group and none here? This isn't a large group anymore, even 20 tickets would have gone a long way towards ensuring that long-time list members had a shot. And while I've been around a while now, I'm not talking about me, either. That done, by all means give the other 30 over to Facebook.
For that matter, why not offer more straight to the fan groups? If we're paying full price anyway, any ticket sold to a fan is mission accomplished, right? So why 50, and not, say, 500? I mean, the way they did it (have Brett review group members by hand and nominate suitable candidates) clearly doesn't scale, but it's not like that's the only possible way to do it....
I tend to assume the positive so will wait for evidence to emerge before I conclude that something sinister is going on :)
having said that, I think Brett has had the connection anyway. I don't see the office deciding that he is the fans' rep. He has connection and as it so happens is also admin of the FB group so they went with him as FB is definitely the more active and visible forum. and I am not surprised Oils wanted it secret. making it public ahead of time would have created a lot of noise and headaches. better ask forgiveness than permission. I do have some issues with how the process panned out but I would have probably done the same thing. The band decided to allocate only 50 and only to NSW and to do it in secret. it wasn't - as far as I can tell - Brett.
I agree that the legacy of this list is far greater but there is no need for this to be an either/or. both forums can co exist and people are free to choose to belong to one or the other or both.
How could people get so unkind?
The Facebook group is popular, so I have to recognise that it has some legitimacy in that respect.
However, it has no shared lineage with this page at all - it started as an awareness/petition group (something like "Powderworkers in support of Midnight Oil Reformation" and was renamed into a more general fan group after the band announced they would be reforming.
I'm quite annoyed that it's being treated as the "real" Powderworks, and Brett Beattie as the fan's representative to the Office. This list, though diminished, is the real deal, and members here have had a relationship with the Office for far longer than the Facebook group has existed.
In a conversation on FB, Brett claimed that the secret process was per requests from the Office. I'm sceptical, but they're talking to him and not to us, so how should we know?