Midnight Oil

Subject: Re: Fw: [powderworks] NMOC: Yucca Mountain Waste Dump-Looking Dead!
From: Kate Adams
Date: 6/03/2010, 2:50 am
To: Powderworks

I got me one of them there Materials Science and Engineering degrees, too.�From MIT (IIIa, 1989) as a matter of fact.� I'm not buying the "technological solution of the month" here.
I also keenly remember being held after school until 6:30 pm with no warning, bored and hungry, because they were moving shit out of Hanford around.� Blank days on the lunch calendar� meant no school and stay inside - heaven help you if you needed to get to hospital on the other side of town.�
A few years ago, I personally delivered a copy of a report comissioned by multiple organizations to my US Rep (Markey) at his local office which indicated that the safest answer for the waste - from a stability and national homeland security standpoint -�was to build hardened on-site storage that required no transportation and accounted for the heat with passive cooling and provided for on-site security while better options were pursued.� Of course this scheme, though economical compared to Yucca overall, still holds those who generated it accountable for their mess and makes them pay for it.
Consider as well that goods movement issues include all transport in the life cycle. The mobile source pollution that any shipment scheme entails is now a high EPA environmental justice priority.�
Chu is a competent scientist, not an industry hack.� He can tell pollyanna� "reclassify the criteria and the problem goes away" nonsense from the reality of a poor selection of an seizmically and hydrologically unstable site.�

kPa

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Kate Adams <kate@dnki.net> wrote:


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jacques Cuneo <jacquescuneo@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:43 AM
Subject: Fw: [powderworks] NMOC: Yucca Mountain Waste Dump-Looking Dead!
To: canadavros@yahoo.com.au, kate@dnki.net, daniels1975@gmail.com, glitchbaby1976@yahoo.com


Due to the vagaries of accessing email at work I am unable to get this through to the list.� I did want to supply a reply to my previous comments.� If someone happens to have the time to forward this to the list I'd appreciate it.

Take care.

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Jacques Cuneo <jacquescuneo@yahoo.com>
To: powderworks@yahoogroups.com.au
Sent: Fri, March 5, 2010 9:18:45 AM
Subject: Re: [powderworks] NMOC: Yucca Mountain Waste Dump-Looking Dead!


No need to start an argument - I should have kept my mouth shut.� The whole left-of-Marx thing was a bit of hyperbole.� He is way, way left, but obviously (and I thought it was obvious - I should know better in this format) not actually left of Marx.

As far as the Oils' point of view I agree with a large number of ideas they sung about.� Nuclear energy (not talking weapons), though, they are dead wrong.� Just my opinion.�

As a materials engineer I am intimately familiar with the technologies that were to be used to encapsulate and store the nuclear waste.�� I have worked with the materials for other purposes (I'm not in the nuclear field at all, so my job isn't at stake or anything).� It would have worked.� The site was a good choice.� We spent massive amounts of money to put things in place.� It is a shame (IMO) that NIMBY killed it.�

BTW, I have a number of opinions that are contradictory with every "normal" political line of thought.� But I am still a huge Oils fan.� In fact, last weekend I ran my first half-marathon.� My song list for the last (many) miles included a bunch of Scream in Blue and the good stuff from Diesel (Bullroarer, Sell Your Soul - the pumping stuff).� My 1:41 finish on a hilly course made for a great day - and the Oils dragged me to the finish line in style. ;-)

Take care.