Re: [powderworks] NMOC: Risk and incompetence

that it might be. but unlike all other journalists at least he put up a case backed up by actually doing some research and trying to construct a logical flow and conclusion. he may have gotten it wrong, he may be a PG lobbyist in disguise, Rudd's 2nd cousin twice removed, a union cronie or god forbid a communist traitor. but if you want to debunk it (assuming this is your intent) you should, at the very least, provide some counter arguments and if possible a nod towards where we might find some evidence would be nice. don't get me wrong, i never let details bother me, i trust what you say, but i like a good read. after all, i hear the iphone has an excellent on-screen keyboard so surely we can expect more than one line

Miron

How could people get so unkind?

From: Oilyshark <oilyshark@optusnet.com>
To: Tom <tomspencer@eml.cc>
Cc: "powderworks@yahoogroups.com.au" <powderworks@yahoogroups.com.au>
Sent: Fri, February 26, 2010 11:35:30 AM
Subject: Re: [powderworks] NMOC: Risk and incompetence

Biggest load of crap I've ever read... Well part read....the only negligance is the useless labour party, both state and federal. What a shambles.

Sent from my iPhone

On 25/02/2010, at 10:10 AM, "Tom" <tomspencer@eml. cc> wrote:

Crikey claims the Govt insulation program actually reduced the rate of installation- caused fires.

Further, that there has been gross negligence by journalists from both Uncle Rupert Murdoch and Aunty (ABC).

http://blogs. crikey.com. au/pollytics/ 2010/02/24/ risk-and- incompetence- in-an-insulated- media/

t