I once asked a question months ago which wasn't rhetorical and I didn't get an answer (maybe fellow powdies thought I was having a go at PG, if so that couldn't be farther from the truth) and the question was does it make people wonder whenever PG is asked or questioned about his support for the pulp mill rather than him explaining why its a good idea and why supporting it doesn't make him a traitor or contradict he instead gives the answer which is always the previous government holding back in such things as signing the kyoto protocol, investing in renewable and clean energy etc?

This is not a rhetorical question and I'm still a supporter of Peter Garrett

tr_espen <tomspencer@eml.cc> wrote:

Dear Powdies

For those of us concerned whether the Federal Environment Minister
will stand his ground:

http://www.afr.com/home/viewer.aspx?ATL://1219363064784&section=search&ti
tle=Garrett%3a+Gunns+unlikely+to+meet+deadline

I dunno, these smart-alec lawyers using legal tricks like the rule of
law and the need to obey legislation...  It's enough to make you doubt
that PGa has sold out.

t

Ashoka Chowta Graphic Designs
Myrtle Bank SA, 5064
Australia 
Mobile: 0404 217 028 
Tele: 8379 8756 
http://aschgraphicdesigns.com.au/